|
|
|
|
EPA TRASHES ECONOMIC GROWTH, JOBS, AND THE RULE OF LAWby William Perry Pendley April 1, 2011 As Congress seeks to reign in the most out-of-control federal agency in Washington, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), folks in West Virginia wonder whether relief from the EPA’s empire building, enforcement actions, and edits will come in time. Coal mining is crucial to West Virginia’s economy; in 2009, for example, it employed more than 30,000 people directly and 105,000 people indirectly and paid $2 billion in wages. Forty percent of the State’s coal is extracted by surface mining, during which the overburden created is used to re-contour the mined area to approximate original contour; but, because not all overburden can be returned to the mined area and because of the State’s terrain, the only feasible disposal site for much overburden is in adjacent hollows. Those hollows, even if they carry water only as runoff during or following rainstorms, constitute, under the Clean Water Act (CWA), “navigable waters.” Thus, surface mining in West Virginia often requires a CWA § 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). In Logan County in southwestern West Virginia, Mingo Logan Coal Company, a subsidiary of Arch Coal, Inc., operates a coal mine known as Spruce No. 1. In March 1997, Mingo Logan sought a permit from the Corps, pursuant to Nationwide Permit 21; however, after two years that process, which involved the EPA, ended when, in a federal lawsuit by environmental groups that did not implicate Spruce No. 1, a district court enjoined use of Nationwide Permit 21. The Corps withdrew its proffered permit. In March 1999, Mingo Logan applied for a § 404(a) permit. Notwithstanding the two-year process just completed, the Corps began anew; meanwhile, Spruce No. 1’s project was modified. Instead of recovering nearly all of the coal, only 75% will be recovered: reducing the acreage impacted from 3,113 to 2,278; halving the spoil to be removed; and, cutting the acres of “navigable waters” affected from 12 to 8.11 acres, which include: 0.12 acres of wetland (an abandoned farm pond), 1.83 acres of ephemeral (storm runoff only) streams, 6.13 acres of intermittent (seasonal only) streams, and 0.034 acres of a perennial (permanently flowing) stream. In March 2006, the Corps released its sixteen hundred page Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the first of its kind for an individual West Virginia surface mine, in which five state and federal agencies, including the EPA, participated. In September 2006, the Corps released a Final EIS, which included 58 pages addressing the EPA’s comments on the Draft EIS. In January 2007, the Corps issued Mingo Logan a § 404 permit for Spruce No. 1; however, it also imposed extensive mitigation conditions requiring that Mingo Logan: create wetlands, enhance thousands of feet of existing streams, plant tens of thousands of native trees and shrubs, and engage in long-term monitoring to ensure environmental mitigation. The Corps’ review of the Spruce No. 1 project’s permit application lasted seven years, generated tens of thousands of pages of administrative record, and cost Mingo Logan millions of dollars. Prior to the issuance of the Corps’ permit, the EPA lodged no objections, nor did it seek to exercise its statutory authority to “elevate” a challenge to the Corps’ permit. There is no question but that Mingo Logan complied with the Corps’ permit. Nonetheless, on January 13, 2011, the EPA, asserting authority under § 404(c), revoked the Corps’ permit. Meanwhile, on April 2, 2010, Mingo Logan, anticipating the EPA’s action given a Federal Register notice, sued challenging the EPA’s authority to void the permit. At that time, the EPA acknowledged it had never used § 404(c) to review, let alone revoke, an already-issued permit in the 38-year history of the CWA. In February, Mingo Logan amended its complaint and last week federal lawyers filed their answer and documents regarding the EPA’s decision; therefore, the battle is joined. At stake is no less than the question of the continuing vitality of the rule of law. direct lender payday loan
|
|
Mountain States Legal Foundation (MSLF) is a nonprofit,
public interest legal foundation dedicated to individual liberty, the right
to own and use property, limited and ethical government, and economic freedom. It is an Internal Revenue Code 501(c)(3) entity
incorporated in the State of Colorado. Csontributions
to Mountain States Legal Foundation are tax deductible. [Mission] [Press
Releases] [Legal Cases] [Legal
Assistance ] |
